i have never been in one of these cars just seen them think they really cool just hope im doing the right thing by selling my escort
not quite sure
-
Steve_cc
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 10:12 pm
- Location: Nottingham, England
-
Derek
- Posts: 5541
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2001 1:00 am
- Location: West Lothian, Scotland
if cost and fuel economy differences aren't a problem then go for the 2.0SE
i think you will find the CC better than the escort
i think you will find the CC better than the escort
Derek
206CC 2.0SE Owner 2001 to 2004 - 308CC GT Owner 2010 to 2011 - Now RCZ GT 200BHP Owner
[img]http://www.ecosse-peugeot.co.uk/images/ecosse_logo.gif[/img] Peugeot Specialists: http://www.ecosse-peugeot.co.uk
206CC 2.0SE Owner 2001 to 2004 - 308CC GT Owner 2010 to 2011 - Now RCZ GT 200BHP Owner
[img]http://www.ecosse-peugeot.co.uk/images/ecosse_logo.gif[/img] Peugeot Specialists: http://www.ecosse-peugeot.co.uk
-
Mr_AWOL
- Posts: 1720
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 6:41 pm
- Location: Dover, Kent
Dependent on budget etc, obviously the 2 litre is a better car. however, i always advise that people should get a 1.6 WITH leather interior rather than a 2.0 WITHOUT, as that for me is more noticable than the auto lights and marginal difference in driving feel
Then again, if you're going for a second hand one and you see a deal on a cc without leather then one of the members (chadd) is selling a leather interior - dont know how much he wants though
Then again, if you're going for a second hand one and you see a deal on a cc without leather then one of the members (chadd) is selling a leather interior - dont know how much he wants though
-
Derek
- Posts: 5541
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2001 1:00 am
- Location: West Lothian, Scotland
-
Vanda
- Posts: 1389
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 7:02 pm
- Location: Nottinghamshire
Oi you Ive got a 1.6 some of us are penalized through insurance!!!!don't confuse the 1.6 with the dyson hoover
Anyhow the 1.6 is ok....admittedly my 1.4 Tigra could have beat the shit out of it anyday but at least it's solid!
[url=http://www.peugeot206cc.co.uk/newowners?id=434]Owner434[/url]
Sex alleviates tension.....love causes it!
Sex alleviates tension.....love causes it!
-
Mr_AWOL
- Posts: 1720
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 6:41 pm
- Location: Dover, Kent
I bought the 1.6 partly because i drove them both, and expected better fuel economy than i'm getting :rolleyes: also partly coz it was a choice between car exactly as i wanted in 1.6 format in less than two weeks, or ten week wait for the 2 litre
There is an almost un-noticable difference in the feel to the cars, and most motoring magazines at the time recommended the 1.6 as better value - again saying the difference in the drive was minimal. (dunno what they say now) especially now the cars look practically identical (and who gives a sh1t about auto lights and wipers - waste of time) the only real benefit is the climate control
There is an almost un-noticable difference in the feel to the cars, and most motoring magazines at the time recommended the 1.6 as better value - again saying the difference in the drive was minimal. (dunno what they say now) especially now the cars look practically identical (and who gives a sh1t about auto lights and wipers - waste of time) the only real benefit is the climate control
-
carl
- Posts: 706
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: East Herts
But the best things in life are worth waiting for. We had a 3 month wait for the CC. Previously I had a six month wait for an Impreza (and I'd spent a year lusting after one and saving up prior to that).also partly coz it was a choice between car exactly as i wanted in 1.6 format in less than two weeks, or ten week wait for the 2 litre
[url=http://www.peugeot206cc.co.uk/newowners?id=442]Ex owner number 442[/url]
-
Mr_AWOL
- Posts: 1720
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 6:41 pm
- Location: Dover, Kent
I know what you mean. however, i felt (and still do) that getting the car two months early would make me happier than the slight engine difference and a load of features i quite frankly couldnt give a sh1te about!
Ignoring the 0-60 time (since i know most people on here realise that really is very little indication of how fast a car feels, or even is) the 1.6 takes less than 2 seconds longer to travel a kilometre from a standing start. i am told this is something to do with the 2.0 power curve, inefficiencies in producing torque at various revs, etc, and that the 1.6 actually accelerates faster from 50 - 80 mph (or some speeds around that range, im not 100% sure, i looked into all this at least 18 months ago)
of course, this could all be a load of bollox, but its what i got from my research at the time, and is largely from reliable sources. I'm just throwing in my own 2p and passing on what i got told. also, i still maintain that if i was on a budget, i would choose leather over the higher engine (not that it matters with allures about)
Ignoring the 0-60 time (since i know most people on here realise that really is very little indication of how fast a car feels, or even is) the 1.6 takes less than 2 seconds longer to travel a kilometre from a standing start. i am told this is something to do with the 2.0 power curve, inefficiencies in producing torque at various revs, etc, and that the 1.6 actually accelerates faster from 50 - 80 mph (or some speeds around that range, im not 100% sure, i looked into all this at least 18 months ago)
of course, this could all be a load of bollox, but its what i got from my research at the time, and is largely from reliable sources. I'm just throwing in my own 2p and passing on what i got told. also, i still maintain that if i was on a budget, i would choose leather over the higher engine (not that it matters with allures about)
-
Derek
- Posts: 5541
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2001 1:00 am
- Location: West Lothian, Scotland