Cool rant
It seems to me that we are never going to agree on this one, all i am trying to show is that there are 2 sides to the story

. But i am not quoting from the FBU magazine !.
It is true about the selection though, you should try interviewing some of them. I am not saying that everyone one is like that but a vast percentage are.
The pay increase is not to do with how dangerous the job is, that risk is reduced by training, experience and having enough Firefighters to tackle the incident safely. Reducing the number of stations and Firefighters will cost public lives, the sad fact is though that the public never get to hear about it due to the media.
21500 then take out pension contributions(granted you dont have to be in the pension scheme) and wages do drop below the average and Firefighters ARE claiming benefits.
Firefighters deserve more money because they have already modernised, by visiting schools, educating the public, fitting smoke alarms etc and for no substantial increase in pay.
I am sure every point that i make you will have an arguement against and likewise I have an answer for everything you can say too.
At the end of the day most people never need the fire service but that once in a lifetime when they do, when their whole world is going downhill fast if you talk to them then, firefighters are worth every penny and more, (stange that i seem to Remember Mrs Thatcher saying something similar after being dug out of the Brighton hotel following the bombings!!)
I am not trying to change anybodys mind on this matter just inform them that there are two sides of the arguement thats all and the press only tends to show one
Carry on with rant if you like
