##COME ON##
- Dan
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 12:49 pm
- Location: Kent
I had a KA before my 1.6CC and found the KA to be very nippy. The 1.6CC is slow from 1st to 2nd but only if you are in low revs and the car is cold (never underestimate the bad performance of a cold engine) If the car is new then its going to be slow anyway as pugs usually are.
Of course the CC is heavy to drive, its obvious just by looking at it
It's also 4 seconds quicker to 60 which is an eternity 
Enjoy the car, it's fast enough
Of course the CC is heavy to drive, its obvious just by looking at it
Enjoy the car, it's fast enough
-
hottest_cc2
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 8:00 am
i had a KA before my cc...how weird is that? lol bit of a difference isn't there!!!
i wouldnt know about the 1.6 sorry, cos I have the 2.0....that is a bit slow for my liking sometimes!!
i wouldnt know about the 1.6 sorry, cos I have the 2.0....that is a bit slow for my liking sometimes!!
used to be hottest_cc...but changed my e-mail addy by mistake & now I can't get my password reminder...Oh well, that's why I'm hottest_cc2!